Abstract Details
(2020) A USANS/SANS Study of Porosity Creation and Evolution in Copper-Iron Sulphides during Hydrothermal Mineral-Fluid Reactions
Adegoke IA, Xia F, Kartal M & Mata JP
https://doi.org/10.46427/gold2020.17
The author has requested that this abstract is not discussed on social media.
The author has not provided any additional details.
07a: Room 2, Wednesday 24th June 07:12 - 07:15
Idowu Abiodun Adegoke
View all 3 abstracts at Goldschmidt2020
Fang Xia View all 5 abstracts at Goldschmidt2020 View abstracts at 5 conferences in series
Muhammet Kartal View all 2 abstracts at Goldschmidt2020 View abstracts at 2 conferences in series
Jitendra P. Mata View all 2 abstracts at Goldschmidt2020
Fang Xia View all 5 abstracts at Goldschmidt2020 View abstracts at 5 conferences in series
Muhammet Kartal View all 2 abstracts at Goldschmidt2020 View abstracts at 2 conferences in series
Jitendra P. Mata View all 2 abstracts at Goldschmidt2020
Listed below are questions that have been submitted by the community that the author will try and cover in their presentation. To submit a question, ensure you are signed in to the website. Authors or session conveners approve questions before they are displayed here.
Submitted by Juliane Weber on Tuesday 23rd June 01:31
Thanks for this nice study & presentation of results. I might have missed it, but I am wondering if the (U)SANS characterization was spatially resolved? For the anoxic conditions, it looks like the samples shows chemical inhomogeneities. How was this accounted for in the (U)SANS characterization?
Thanks for your comments on our presentation and the questions. Our data was not spatially resolved because we did bulk measurement. For the likely chemical inhomogenieities, the SLDs (scattering length densities) of the phases are close to each other (ranging from 3.107 for covellite to 3.896 for chalcocite) as compared to pores (assuming it is 0), so the interference should be minimal. We also thresholded our results by ~8 ?m since there is more contribution from the intergranular spaces above this limit. Thanks, and hopefully this answers your questions.
Thanks for this nice study & presentation of results. I might have missed it, but I am wondering if the (U)SANS characterization was spatially resolved? For the anoxic conditions, it looks like the samples shows chemical inhomogeneities. How was this accounted for in the (U)SANS characterization?
Thanks for your comments on our presentation and the questions. Our data was not spatially resolved because we did bulk measurement. For the likely chemical inhomogenieities, the SLDs (scattering length densities) of the phases are close to each other (ranging from 3.107 for covellite to 3.896 for chalcocite) as compared to pores (assuming it is 0), so the interference should be minimal. We also thresholded our results by ~8 ?m since there is more contribution from the intergranular spaces above this limit. Thanks, and hopefully this answers your questions.
Sign in to ask a question.