Abstract Details
(2020) The Neoproterozoic Fangcheng Nb-Rich Alkaline Rocks, Central China: Magma Origin and Evolution
Zhu Y-X, Wang L-X, Ma C-Q & Wiedenbeck M
https://doi.org/10.46427/gold2020.3223
The author has not provided any additional details.
03i: Room 1, Thursday 25th June 22:33 - 22:36
Yu-Xiang Zhu
View abstracts at 2 conferences in series
Lian-Xun Wang View abstracts at 3 conferences in series
Chang-Qian Ma View all 4 abstracts at Goldschmidt2020 View abstracts at 2 conferences in series
Michael Wiedenbeck
Lian-Xun Wang View abstracts at 3 conferences in series
Chang-Qian Ma View all 4 abstracts at Goldschmidt2020 View abstracts at 2 conferences in series
Michael Wiedenbeck
Listed below are questions that have been submitted by the community that the author will try and cover in their presentation. To submit a question, ensure you are signed in to the website. Authors or session conveners approve questions before they are displayed here.
Submitted by Yu-Xiang Zhu on Friday 8th May 02:46
The title of the article may be wrong and needs to be changed to "The Neoproterozoic Fangcheng Nb-rich Alkaline Rocks, Central China: Magma Origin and Evolution"
The title of the article may be wrong and needs to be changed to "The Neoproterozoic Fangcheng Nb-rich Alkaline Rocks, Central China: Magma Origin and Evolution"
Submitted by Kathryn Goodenough on Thursday 25th June 15:20
These look like very interesting rocks, but I am just wondering if there are any field relationships that support the wide range in ages? The geochronological results show fairly significant errors, which would equally be consistent with all the lithologies being emplaced relative rapidly at about 850 Ma.
These look like very interesting rocks, but I am just wondering if there are any field relationships that support the wide range in ages? The geochronological results show fairly significant errors, which would equally be consistent with all the lithologies being emplaced relative rapidly at about 850 Ma.
Sign in to ask a question.