Abstract Details
(2020) Bridging the Gap between Faraday Cup and Ion Counting Measurements – A Faraday Detector with the Equivalent Noise Performance of a 1014 Ω Resistor Amplifier
Yardley S, Volkovoy V, Hockley M, Tootell D & Palacz Z
https://doi.org/10.46427/gold2020.3022
06n: Room 2, Wednesday 24th June 08:27 - 08:30
Shaun Yardley
View abstracts at 3 conferences in series
Vadim Volkovoy View abstracts at 2 conferences in series
Matt Hockley View abstracts at 3 conferences in series
Damian Tootell View abstracts at 6 conferences in series
Zenon Palacz View abstracts at 8 conferences in series
Vadim Volkovoy View abstracts at 2 conferences in series
Matt Hockley View abstracts at 3 conferences in series
Damian Tootell View abstracts at 6 conferences in series
Zenon Palacz View abstracts at 8 conferences in series
Listed below are questions that have been submitted by the community that the author will try and cover in their presentation. To submit a question, ensure you are signed in to the website. Authors or session conveners approve questions before they are displayed here.
Submitted by Yuri Amelin on Wednesday 24th June 06:00
Great development. If I understand correctly, your current system includes one Faraday cup behind the focal plane that is connected with Zeptona electrometer. What is the prospect of building a system with several such electrometers? Do you expect that the mechanism of cup movement would be the dominant source of noise for such a system? Would it be advantageous to put it in a mass spectrometer with fixed cups and variable dispersion (zoom lens)?
Great development. If I understand correctly, your current system includes one Faraday cup behind the focal plane that is connected with Zeptona electrometer. What is the prospect of building a system with several such electrometers? Do you expect that the mechanism of cup movement would be the dominant source of noise for such a system? Would it be advantageous to put it in a mass spectrometer with fixed cups and variable dispersion (zoom lens)?
Submitted by Bryant Ware on Wednesday 24th June 07:20
Very fascinating how technology is advancing. Would this be something where gains are seen most specifically in the U-Pb system or would this be widely obtained when other isotope systems are measured?
Very fascinating how technology is advancing. Would this be something where gains are seen most specifically in the U-Pb system or would this be widely obtained when other isotope systems are measured?
Submitted by Hauke Vollstaedt on Wednesday 24th June 08:16
Shaun, could you comment on the temperature and temperature stability of the Atona/Zeptona detector housing? What is the requirement for getting stable baselines, gains and measurement precision?
Shaun, could you comment on the temperature and temperature stability of the Atona/Zeptona detector housing? What is the requirement for getting stable baselines, gains and measurement precision?
Submitted by Charles Magee on Wednesday 24th June 14:49
Do you have linearity issues when charged up to high voltages due to changes in ghost capacitance and or electrostatic flexure in components?
Do you have linearity issues when charged up to high voltages due to changes in ghost capacitance and or electrostatic flexure in components?
Sign in to ask a question.