Abstract Details
(2020) Platinum Group Element (PGE) Geochemistry as a Tool to Determine Sulfide Saturation and Magma Fertility
Misztela M & Campbell I
https://doi.org/10.46427/gold2020.1814
The author has not provided any additional details.
04d: Room 1, Friday 26th June 05:42 - 05:45
Monika Misztela
Ian Campbell View all 6 abstracts at Goldschmidt2020 View abstracts at 2 conferences in series
Ian Campbell View all 6 abstracts at Goldschmidt2020 View abstracts at 2 conferences in series
Listed below are questions that have been submitted by the community that the author will try and cover in their presentation. To submit a question, ensure you are signed in to the website. Authors or session conveners approve questions before they are displayed here.
Submitted by Roberta L. Rudnick on Monday 22nd June 19:21
For the Yerington suite, you state that the PGEs & Au demonstrate sulfide saturation @~3 wt.% MgO because that is when their concentrations begin to fall. Why doesn't Cu show the same trend? What, besides sulfides is controlling the Cu concentrations?
For the Yerington suite, you state that the PGEs & Au demonstrate sulfide saturation @~3 wt.% MgO because that is when their concentrations begin to fall. Why doesn't Cu show the same trend? What, besides sulfides is controlling the Cu concentrations?
Submitted by Roberta L. Rudnick on Monday 22nd June 19:21
For the Yerington suite, you state that the PGEs & Au demonstrate sulfide saturation @~3 wt.% MgO because that is when their concentrations begin to fall. Why doesn't Cu show the same trend? What, besides sulfides is controlling the Cu concentrations?
For the Yerington suite, you state that the PGEs & Au demonstrate sulfide saturation @~3 wt.% MgO because that is when their concentrations begin to fall. Why doesn't Cu show the same trend? What, besides sulfides is controlling the Cu concentrations?
Sign in to ask a question.