Home

  • Program

    The Goldschmidt2020 program

  • Venue

    All about the venue and city

  • Registration

    Details of how to register to attend the conference and/or submit an abstract

  • Exhibition

    Information for and about exhibitors and sponsors

  • My Goldschmidt

    My program, purchases, connections, etc.

Home

Program

Events

  • Sponsor Seminars

  • Training Events

    These are scheduled events to help delegates test out the tools and platform we will be using for the Q&A and other events at the conference.

  • Workshops

    Our workshop program provides training and teaching in topics across geochemistry and related fields. We are currently liaising with the workshop organisers to ascertain if any workshops can become virtual. Any updates will be added to this page.

Locations

  • Conference Locations

    Location of the convention center and social events

  • Hotels

    The hotels are no longer available to book at the special rates agreed by the conference. Should you wish to cancel or change your hotel reservation please see the details below.

Information

Present your work

Attend

Exhibition

Sponsorships

My Goldschmidt

Role functions

Abstract Details

Terminal Porosity and the Geochemical Detectability of Plutonic Residues of Melt Extraction

Gao K, Keller B & Ma C

Gao K, Keller B & Ma C (2020) Goldschmidt Abstracts, 2020 786

Sorry, the PDF cannot be displayed on your browser.

Download abstract

04j: Room 1, View in program

Listed below are questions that have been submitted by the community that the author will try and cover in their presentation. To submit a question, ensure you are signed in to the website. Authors or session conveners approve questions before they are displayed here.

Submitted by Changqian Ma on
Thank you for showing a very interesting study! Based on your modelling results, to understand the relationship between volcanic and plutonic rocks, what issues should we pay special attention to when carrying out a granite case study?
Thank you for your question! I think it will be direct if we could find a continuous geological section that includes volcanic and plutonic rocks. We will be able to do meticulous mineralogical, petrological, and geochemical work on it.

Submitted by Calvin Miller on
Very interesting, thank you for your presentation! A couple of questions: (1) I agree that extracted melts and cumulates are likely to be readily resolvable; are you saying that the rock record reveals this distinction, or that there is little or no record of this distinction?; (2) Are you aware of a number of recent papers that purport to have identified erupted remobilized cumulate magmas that are complementary to high silica rhyolites? I believe that they could be relevant to your study.
Thank you for your questions! The first question, from global perspectives, the rock record shows little even no record of the distinction between volcanic and plutonic rocks; and the second, we have read some of those papers, they are outstanding work! We think remobilized cumulates (i.e., cumulates that end up in a volcanic rock) could definitely help explain the lack of offset in composition between volcanic and plutonic. We saw potential evidence of remobilized cumulates at Turkey Creek as well (doi.org/10.1130/G37539.1 — the hypabyssal monzonite porphyry was been interpreted as a residue of melt extraction, which would imply that its dacitic eruptive equivalent is also a remobilized cumulate / residue).

Sign in to ask a question.