• Program

    The Goldschmidt2020 program

  • Venue

    All about the venue and city

  • Registration

    Details of how to register to attend the conference and/or submit an abstract

  • Exhibition

    Information for and about exhibitors and sponsors

  • My Goldschmidt

    My program, purchases, connections, etc.




  • Sponsor Seminars

  • Training Events

    These are scheduled events to help delegates test out the tools and platform we will be using for the Q&A and other events at the conference.

  • Workshops

    Our workshop program provides training and teaching in topics across geochemistry and related fields. We are currently liaising with the workshop organisers to ascertain if any workshops can become virtual. Any updates will be added to this page.


  • Conference Locations

    Location of the convention center and social events

  • Hotels

    The hotels are no longer available to book at the special rates agreed by the conference. Should you wish to cancel or change your hotel reservation please see the details below.


Present your work




My Goldschmidt

Role functions

Abstract Details

(2020) Suppression of Plagioclase and Clinopyroxene Nucleation in a Basaltic Magma: Insights from Real-Time Synchrotron Tomography

Le Gall N, Arzilli F, Cai B, Polacci M, Vo N, La Spina G, Hartley M, Atwood R, Di Genova D, Nonni S, Llewellin E, Burton M & Lee P


Sorry, the PDF cannot be displayed on your browser.

Download abstract

The author has not provided any additional details.

05e: Room 2, View in program

Listed below are questions that have been submitted by the community that the author will try and cover in their presentation. To submit a question, ensure you are signed in to the website. Authors or session conveners approve questions before they are displayed here.

Submitted by Julia Hammer on
Nice presentation, and interesting results! a comment/ inference about why the stepwise experiments produced cpx whereas the constant-rate experiments did not: The step-cooling experiments promoted faster growth of plagioclase because of higher DT at moment of nucleation. The failure of compositional boundary layer in the liquid surrounding plag to relax caused supersaturation of cpx. By contrast, the constant-rate cooling experiments promoted diffusive relaxation of the boundary layers and this "suppressed" cpx nucleation. If this is correct, the constant-rate cooling experiments produced cpx closer to it's equilibrium-in temperature. I.e., for me this is not an issue of nucleation suppression in the constant-rate (linear cooling) experiments, but rather hastened nucleation in the isothermal (dwell-type) experiments. Is this a possibility you have considered? Or do you have an alternate interpretation?

Sign in to ask a question.