Home

  • Program

    The Goldschmidt2020 program

  • Venue

    All about the venue and city

  • Registration

    Details of how to register to attend the conference and/or submit an abstract

  • Exhibition

    Information for and about exhibitors and sponsors

  • My Goldschmidt

    My program, purchases, connections, etc.

Home

Program

Events

  • Sponsor Seminars

  • Training Events

    These are scheduled events to help delegates test out the tools and platform we will be using for the Q&A and other events at the conference.

  • Workshops

    Our workshop program provides training and teaching in topics across geochemistry and related fields. We are currently liaising with the workshop organisers to ascertain if any workshops can become virtual. Any updates will be added to this page.

Locations

  • Conference Locations

    Location of the convention center and social events

  • Hotels

    The hotels are no longer available to book at the special rates agreed by the conference. Should you wish to cancel or change your hotel reservation please see the details below.

Information

Present your work

Attend

Exhibition

Sponsorships

My Goldschmidt

Role functions

Abstract Details

Is Paleoproterozoic Atmospheric Oxygenation Linked to the Emergence of Continents Above Sea-Level? Evidence from Sulfur and Oxygen Isotopic Signatures in Archean to Proterozoic Sediment-Derived Granitoids

Liebmann J, Spencer CJ, Bucholz CE, Kirkland CL, Martin L, Xia X-P & Kitchen N

Liebmann J, Spencer CJ, Bucholz CE, Kirkland CL, Martin L, Xia X-P & Kitchen N (2020) Goldschmidt Abstracts, 2020 1554

Sorry, the PDF cannot be displayed on your browser.

Download abstract

The author has not provided any additional details.

09d: Room 3, View in program

Listed below are questions that have been submitted by the community that the author will try and cover in their presentation. To submit a question, ensure you are signed in to the website. Authors or session conveners approve questions before they are displayed here.

Submitted by Janne Liebmann on
Hi Jingjun, thanks for your question. The figure you are referring to shows the environment of emplacement (subaerial vs. submarine) of continental LIPs. We argue for a ~2.4 Ga emergence of continents, because at this time the fraction of subaerially erupted continental LIPs increases from ~10% to ~70%. In contrast, the vast majority of continental LIP events around 2.7 Ga show evidence for submarine eruption. We interpret the increase in subaerial continental LIP volcanism to be related to an increase in subaerial continental area (i.e. the subaerial emergence of continents). A 2.4 Ga emergence of continents is further supported by a change in oxygen isotope composition of shales, which has been linked to the onset of a modern hydrological cycle (Bindeman et al., 2018, Nature), a change in average oxygen isotope ratio of detrital zircon (Spencer et al., 2019, GCA), and an increase in seawater 87Sr/86Sr ratio (Flament et al., 2013 , Precambrian Research) all of which have been reasonably linked to subaerially exposed continents. Note that the figure showing the proportion of subaerial continental LIPs only includes LIP events for which the environment of eruption could be determined (based on characteristics of associated extrusive rocks and/or sediments). However, as for many of these Precambrian LIP events only dyke swarms are preserved, a definitive categorization was not possible in some cases. Events that could not be classified are not shown in this figure. I hope this answers your question!


Sign in to ask a question.